Legal Opinion

Van Osdol v. Knappton Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 15, 1988No. A8401-00492; CA A41879PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*501ROSSMAN, J.

This action is before us for the second time. In the previous appeal, 73 Or App 684, 699 P2d 1176 (1985), Knappton Corporation (Knappton) had been granted a summary judgment on the ground that respondeat superior did not apply and, therefore, that it was not liable for the negligence of its employe, Eubanks. We reversed. On remand, the trial court denied plaintiffs motion for directed verdict on his claim against Knappton, and the jury found for Knappton. Plaintiff appeals, contending that the court erred in denying his motion for a directed verdict. We reverse with instructions to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Chesterman v. BarmonOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Stanfield v. LaccoarceOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Heide v. TCI INCORPORATEDOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Tiedemann v. Radiation Therapy ConsultantsOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Koch v. Southern Pacific Transportation CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1976

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kim v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  2. Sheets v. ChepkoCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  3. Wall Street Management & Capital, Inc. v. CritesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  4. Weiner Investment Co. v. WeinerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  5. Osterman v. OsgoodCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API