Legal Opinion

State v. Curtis.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 2017No. SCWC-12-0000133PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

RECKTENWALD, C.J.

This case requires us to determine what information must appear on the face of an “anticipatory” search warrant, i.e., a warrant that cannot be executed until some expected future event occurs. This case arose when a FedEx employee discovered marijuana in a package addressed to a residence on Kaua'i. The Kaua'i Police Department (KPD) was contacted and decided to conduct a controlled delivery of the package to the address listed. They applied for a warrant to allow them to search the premises upon completion of the delivery. However, rather than listing…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. United States v. ChadwickSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. United States v. GrubbsSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. State v. JenkinsHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. KalunaHawaii Supreme Court · 1974
  5. United States v. Garcia, Appeal of Jose A. Figueroa-Rivera, Gabriel Grant, Celina Wilson-GrantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State of Iowa v. Jesus Angel RamirezSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
  2. State v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  3. Amended August 1, 2017 State of Iowa v. Jesus Angel RamirezSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
  4. State of Iowa v. Jesus Angel RamirezSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
  5. State of Iowa v. Jesus Angel RamirezSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API