Legal Opinion

Rose v. Habenstreit

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 12, 1917PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error: Court of Appeals for Hamilton county.

1Opinion of the CourtGorman, J.

This action was brought by George Rose as the next friend of his infant son, Harold *24Rose. In the petition it was 'claimed that the defendant was liable because of negligence in leaving unguarded and unprotected at the corner of Ash street and Highland avenue in the city of Norwood an apparatus consisting of a pulley and wire cable passing through the same. The pulley and the wire cable were used by defendant in the moving of a house on a public street of Norwood.

There was no question made of the right of defendant to be in the street and to have his apparatus therein.

Defendant, Joseph…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Walsh v. Fitchburg RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  2. Daniels v. New York & New England RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  3. Ryan v. TowarMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Fitzgerald v. RodgersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Klingensmith v. Scioto Valley Traction Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API