Legal Opinion

Sauls v. Whitman

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 12, 1935No. 24398PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPhelps, J.

This is an action by the administrator of the estate of Mary A. Jent against A. J. Sauls and A. L. Tucker to recover double the amount of money which the administrator alleges was the property of Mrs. Jent, which the defendants alienated after her death and prior to the appointment of said administrator. The parties will be referred to as they appeared in, the- trial court. The trial court found that the defendants alienated $1,140 belonging to the decedent and rendered judgment against each of the defendants in double that amount, $2,280, and interest thereon at 6 per cent, from September…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Apache State Bank v. DanielsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  2. Fouts v. NanceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Aultman & Taylor MacHinery Co. v. FussSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  4. Litz v. Exchange BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905
  5. Jahns v. NoltingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Larson v. Quanrud, Brink & ReiboldNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Davis v. National Bank of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  3. Hickman v. BarrettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Girdner v. GirdnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  5. Foster v. RoseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API