Legal Opinion

Lilly v. Terwilliger

Montana Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 1990No. 90-099PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harrison

James and Deborah Bonnett, defendants and counter-plaintiffs below, appeal the judgment issued by Judge Frank Davis, sitting in the Eighteenth Judicial District, Gallatin County. The District Court held that plaintiff and counter-defendant Walen “Bud” Lilly’s sale of repossessed property was commercially reasonable and Lilly was entitled to a deficiency judgment, but, because Lilly’s notice of the sale to the Bonnetts did not comply with the strict requirements of foreclosure on collateral statutes, the District Court effected an adjustment by way of set off as to the deficiency judgment. We…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wippert v. Blackfeet Tribe of the Blackfeet Indian ReservationMontana Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Farmers State Bank v. Mobile Homes UnlimitedMontana Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Bank of Sheridan v. DeversMontana Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Dulan v. Montana Nat. Bank of RoundupMontana Supreme Court · 1983

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Munao v. LagattutaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
  2. Auto Credit, Inc. v. LongMontana Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Love v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1994
  4. Munao v. LagattutaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API