Legal Opinion
Central Irrigation Supply v. Putnam Country Club Associates, LLC
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 30, 2008PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Pursuant to a contract dated March 8, 2000, the plaintiff agreed to install an irrigation system at a golf course owned by the defendant. The contract provided that, if the system was not “installed and fully operational” by May .26, 2000 the plaintiff would be liable to the defendant for liquidated damages in the sum of $200 for each day of delay. After recurrent problems with the system, which necessitated frequent repairs and a modification of a major component, the system became *935fully operational in November 2002. By that time, the plaintiff had already commenced this action to recover…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- JMD Holding Corp. v. Congress Financial Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 2005
- Bates Advertising USA, Inc. v. 498 Seventh, LLCNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
- Jackson Heights Care Center, LLC v. BlochAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Evangelista v. WardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Nir Zeer v. Ziv AzulayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
3Cited by2 opinions
- G3-Purves Street, LLC v. Thomson Purves, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- G3-Purves Street, LLC v. Thomson Purves, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012