Legal Opinion

Smith v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 4, 1988No. Appeal, No. 3654 C.D. 1984PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Craig,

R.A. Smith earlier appealed from a decision of the Pennsylvania State Horse Racing Commission revoking his jockeys license. Smiths appellate brief presented three claims: 1) that the defense of entrapment should apply to administrative proceedings that are of a punitive nature; 2) that the conduct of the special agents of the Attorney Generals office constituted entrapment; and 3) that the special agents failed to comply with provisions of the Wiretapping and Electronic Surveillance Control Act.1

This court, concluding that the defense of entrapment is available in an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SchaefferSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. McKenna v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania State Horse Racing CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Commonwealth v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Smith v. Pennsylvania State Horse Racing CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Smith v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania State Horse Racing CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. McIvorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Commonwealth v. McIvorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API