Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Lichtenstein v. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 31, 1959No. Appeal, No. 187PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Jones,

The Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission condemned and entered upon certain property of Morris Edwin Lichtenstein, the plaintiff, in Towamencin Township, in Montgomery County, for use in the construction of the Delaware Diver Extension of the Pennsylvania Turnpike. In due course, Lichtenstein petitioned the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County for the appointment of viewers for the ascertainment and determination of the damages due him for the Commission’s appropriation of his property. The viewers filed their report on June 24, 1958. Therein they awarded…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  2. Baker v. KirschnekSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. Tunison v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  4. Culver v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  5. Commonwealth v. TrunkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Rader v. Pennsylvania Turnpike CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  2. Specter v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission v. Sanders & Thomas, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Stanley Gerr and Carl Gerr, a Minor by Stanley Gerr, His Guardian v. Harry William Emrick and Pennsylvania Turnpike CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
  5. Wolf v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API