Legal Opinion
Michael Rose v. Loretta E. Lynch
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 17, 2017No. 11-73778UnpublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Respondent’s Motion to Amend (Dkt. 89) is GRANTED IN PART. The memorandum disposition filed on January 24, 2017, is hereby withdrawn; the memorandum disposition submitted simultaneously with this Order shall be filed in its place.
MEMORANDUM **
Petitioner Michael Garfield Rose 1 petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’s (BIA’s) decision affirming an Immigration Judge’s (IJ’s) order of removal. Michael argues that the IJ erroneously ordered him removed because he obtained derivative U.S. citizenship from his mother. Whether Michael obtained derivative citizenship turns on…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Woodby v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Chiad SAELEE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Berenyi v. District Director, Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Fernandez-Ruiz v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Alexander v. SessionsDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2017
- Brito v. BarrDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- Campbell v. SessionsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
- Ding Chen v. Christine WormuthDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2023
- Jackson v. Attorney General United States of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020