State v. Contreras
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CASTILLO, Judge.
{1} Defendant Ginnie Contreras appeals her conviction of harboring a felon contrary to NMSA 1978, § 30-22-4 (1963), arguing that her conviction cannot stand because she harbored a juvenile and juveniles can never be considered felons. This case presents us with a question of first impression: does harboring a juvenile offender, who is not subject to conviction as a felon but whose conduct is classifiable as a felony under the laws of the State of New Mexico, fall within the scope of Section 30-22-4. We hold that an offender who commits acts constituting “a felony” can…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Helman v. GallegosNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. AttawayNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. RowellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. OgdenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. HodgeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. PowelsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
- State v. YazzieNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2017
- State v. YazzieNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2017
- State v. PowelsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003