Legal Opinion

State v. Contreras

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided January 3, 2002No. 21,473PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CASTILLO, Judge.

{1} Defendant Ginnie Contreras appeals her conviction of harboring a felon contrary to NMSA 1978, § 30-22-4 (1963), arguing that her conviction cannot stand because she harbored a juvenile and juveniles can never be considered felons. This case presents us with a question of first impression: does harboring a juvenile offender, who is not subject to conviction as a felon but whose conduct is classifiable as a felony under the laws of the State of New Mexico, fall within the scope of Section 30-22-4. We hold that an offender who commits acts constituting “a felony” can…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Helman v. GallegosNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. AttawayNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. RowellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. OgdenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. HodgeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. PowelsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. State v. YazzieNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. State v. YazzieNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. State v. PowelsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API