Legal Opinion

State v. Anderson

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 27, 1993No. 15085-9-II; 15952-0-IIPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorgan, J.

In separate, unrelated cases, Devron Anderson and David C. Sampson requested reimbursement for "loss of time" and legal fees pursuant to RCW 9A.16.110. The trial court denied each request. Each man appealed, and the appeals were consolidated. We affirm Anderson's case and modify Sampson's.

In March 1990, Anderson fired his shotgun and killed a 14-year-old girl. The next day he was jailed for first degree murder. He remained in jail until the end of his trial.

Because Anderson was indigent, the trial court appointed the Pierce County Department of Assigned Counsel (DAC) to represent him. Soon,…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Powers v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Rawlings v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Hunter v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of the United States · 1907

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. RundquistCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
  2. In re Gen. Motors LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
  3. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
  4. State v. VillanuevaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  5. In re the Marriage of: Brian D. Hamond & Patricia C. Abrams-HamondCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API