Legal Opinion
Finley v. J.C. Pace Ltd.
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
Decided September 9, 1999No. 01-99-00662-CVPublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
2Per curiam
The Court today considered the motion by appellees to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. We DENY the motion.
Procedural History
Final summary judgment was signed on February 19, 1999. Appellant Vanessa Finley filed a “motion for rehearing” on February 23,1999, on which the trial court did not rule. On June 4, 1999, Finley moved to extend time to file her notice of appeal, which this Court granted. Appel-lees now move to dismiss, claiming that Finley’s “motion for rehearing” did not extend the appellate deadlines because (1) the motion for rehearing was not a “motion for new…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Jamar v. PattersonTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Mercer v. BandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970
- Tate v. E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1996
- Arndt v. ArndtCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Spellman v. Hung Duy Hoang, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by57 opinions
- PopCap Games, Inc. v. MUMBOJUMBO, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2011
- Doctor v. Pardue, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2006
- Marathon Corp. v. Pitzner Ex Rel. Pitzner, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2001
- Nucor Steel-Texas v. Public Utility Commission, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2012
- S.E.A. Leasing, Inc. v. Steele, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2007
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.