Legal Opinion

S.E.A. Leasing, Inc. v. Steele

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided August 17, 2007No. 01-05-00189-CVPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION DISSENTING FROM THE DENIAL OF EN BANC RECONSIDERATION

EVELYN V. KEYES, Justice.

I respectfully dissent from denial of en banc reconsideration. The panel opinion in this case adds new and unprecedented hurdles to appellants’ preservation of legal sufficiency points of error. In so doing, it contravenes the objective of Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 1, namely “to obtain a just, fair, equitable and impartial adjudication of the rights of litigants under established principles of substantive law,” to which end the rules “shall be given a liberal construction.” Tex.R. Civ. P. 1. En banc…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. HavnerTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Maritime Overseas Corp. v. EllisTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Cecil v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Jamar v. PattersonTexas Supreme Court · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. John Reed, Jr. v. Farmers Insurance Group, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2015
  2. S.E.A. Leasing, Inc. v. Steele, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API