Gittings v. Schenuit
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from the .Baltimore City Court. (Stump, J.) The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBoyd, C. J.
This is an appeal from a judgment obtained by the appellee against the appellant for damages to his automobile alleged to have been sustained by the negligence of the defendant’s agent. There are eleven bills of exception presenting rulings on evidence, and one presenting the rulings on the prayers — the two offered by the plaintiff having been granted and four of nine offered by the defendant having been rejected.
The automobile owned by the plaintiff was a small, one which he was using at the time in delivering packages. He purchased it second-hand and paid only $50.00 for it, although he…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bourne v. WhitmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
- McMahon v. Northern Central Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1874
- Baltimore City Passenger Railway Co. v. McDonnell ex rel. McDonnellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1876
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. State ex rel. MillerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1868
- Reidel v. Philadelphia, Wilmington & Baltimore R. R.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1898
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Kelly v. Huber Baking Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1924
- Hopper, McGaw & Co. v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1924
- Cumberland & Westernport Transit Co. v. MetzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1930
- Friedman v. Hendler Creamery Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1930
- Taxicab Co. v. HamburgerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1924
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.