Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Pineda

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 18, 2004No. 1-04-0222PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE REID

delivered the opinion of the court:

Defendants David Pineda and Baslisa Pineda appeal from a trial court order barring them from rejecting an arbitration award and entering judgment in favor of plaintiff Neal J. Anderson in the amount of $30,000. On appeal, defendants contend that the trial court erred in barring them from rejecting the arbitration award because debarment is an improper sanction for a prearbitration discovery violation and the sanction is unduly harsh. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

On August 20, 2002, plaintiff filed a complaint to recover for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Goldman v. DhillonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  2. State Farm Insurance v. GebbieAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  3. Knight v. GuzmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  4. Glover v. BarbosaAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  5. Amro v. BellamyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Coleman v. AKPAKPANAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  2. Zietara v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  3. Lopez v. MillerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
  4. Campuzano v. PeritzAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  5. Reyes v. Menard, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API