Town of De Pere v. City of De Pere
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtCane, P.J.
Leo Danen and Eileen Danen appeal a judgment entered in favor of the City of De Pere and dismissing all of the Danens' causes of action against the City. The Danens contend the trial court erred when it concluded that the prohibition in § 66.021(4)(b), Stats., against adding or withdrawing signatures to a direct annexation petition also bars the withdrawal of the petition itself. Because we agree with the trial court, the judgment is affirmed.
In January 1993, the Danens petitioned the City to annex land that they solely owned. The De Pere city council received the petition and referred it to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. ClausenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
- Gonzalez v. TeskeyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990
- State v. MendozaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Boltz v. BoltzCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1986
- Town of Brookfield v. City of BrookfieldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Tomczak v. BaileyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
- Town of Burke v. City of MadisonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999
- Demitropoulos v. Bank One Milwaukee, N.A.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
- Town of Baraboo v. Village of West BarabooCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2005
- Tannler v. State Department of Health & Social ServicesCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.