Legal Opinion

Mayo v. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided July 20, 1992No. 91SC233PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lohr

We granted certiorari to determine whether section 10 — 4—418(2)(b), 4A C.R.S. (1987), which authorizes household exclusion clauses in automobile liability insurance policies, violates the equal protection clauses of the United States and Colorado Constitutions. In general, a household exclusion clause excludes coverage for claims asserted by a member of a household against another member of the same household. See id. After an automobile accident, National Farmers Union Property and Casualty Company (National) brought a declaratory judgment action against its insureds, Clarence W. Mayo and…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Craig v. BorenSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Loving v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Dunn v. BlumsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Farmers Insurance Exchange v. DotsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  2. State, Department of Health v. MillSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  3. People v. AllmanColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. Giuliani v. Jefferson County Board of County CommissionersColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Students for Concealed Carry On Campus, LLC v. Regents of the University of ColoradoColorado Court of Appeals · 2010

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API