Mayo v. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co.
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lohr
We granted certiorari to determine whether section 10 — 4—418(2)(b), 4A C.R.S. (1987), which authorizes household exclusion clauses in automobile liability insurance policies, violates the equal protection clauses of the United States and Colorado Constitutions. In general, a household exclusion clause excludes coverage for claims asserted by a member of a household against another member of the same household. See id. After an automobile accident, National Farmers Union Property and Casualty Company (National) brought a declaratory judgment action against its insureds, Clarence W. Mayo and…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Craig v. BorenSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Loving v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Dunn v. BlumsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Farmers Insurance Exchange v. DotsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- State, Department of Health v. MillSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- People v. AllmanColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
- Giuliani v. Jefferson County Board of County CommissionersColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
- Students for Concealed Carry On Campus, LLC v. Regents of the University of ColoradoColorado Court of Appeals · 2010
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.