In re: T.K.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1ConcurrenceStroud, Judge
*449I concur in the result reached by the majority, since I tend to agree that the juvenile court counselor's signature on the petition may be necessary to invoke jurisdiction, although I also note that the juvenile court counselor was present and participating in the hearing. I write separately to concur because I believe that even if the court had jurisdiction, the adjudication and disposition orders would have to be reversed. It is unusual for a concurring opinion to address an issue which perhaps need not be addressed since the adjudication is being vacated. Yet I also recognize the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. WigginsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Matter of EllerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
- State v. MidgettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
- State v. . RamsaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
- State v. GuthrieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.