Legal Opinion

Luzier Special Formula Laboratories v. State Board of Hairdressing & Beauty Culture Examiners

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 19, 1933No. 29,424PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLT, Justice.

Plaintiff appeals from the order overruling its demurrer to defendants’ answer and refusing a temporary injunction. The court certified that the demurrer presented doubtful and important questions.

Plaintiff is a Missouri corporation engaged in the manufacture and sale of face creams, hair tonics, face powders, depilatories, shampoos, nail polishes, skin tonics, and deodorants, its plant located in Missouri. The complaint alleges that for several years plaintiff’s manufactured goods and wares have been sold by its salesmen to citizens and residents of this state by taking orders,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sinking-Fund CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. State v. ZenoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  3. Banghart v. WalshIllinois Supreme Court · 1930
  4. American Slicing Machine Co. v. JaworskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Minnesota Board of Barber Examiners v. LauranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  2. State v. SullivanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  3. Johnson v. ErvinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  4. United Enterprises, Inc. v. DubeyDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 1941
  5. United Enterprises, Inc. v. DubeyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API