American Slicing Machine Co. v. Jaworski
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, J.
The defendant here urges several detailed errors as to admission and rejection of testimony. Many of these errors are not well assigned and they all become immaterial when the determination of all questions of fact was by the cross-motions for a direfcted verdict devolved upon the court.
It is further urged that the finding of the court to the effect that the contract was procured without fraud or misrepresentation on the part of Pond, the agent of the plaintiff, is against the clear weight or great preponderance of the evidence. We shall not attempt to restate the evidence. There is a clear…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Phœnix Nursery Co. v. TrostelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1917
- Rib Falles Lumber Co. v. Lesh & Mathews Lumber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
- Regina Co. v. ToynbeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
- Unitype Co. v. SchwittayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1919
3Cited by3 opinions
- Union Trust Co. of Maryland v. RodemanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
- Luzier Special Formula Laboratories v. State Board of Hairdressing & Beauty Culture ExaminersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- W. M. Bell Co. v. EmbersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924