Legal Opinion
State v. Rickenberg
Utah Supreme Court
Decided June 2, 1921No. 3644PublishedCited by 12 opinions
Appeal from District Court, Third District, Salt Lake County; L. B. Wight, Judge. . Henry Rickenberg was charged with having unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor. From a judgment dismissing the case, the State appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtThurman, J.
The questions presented on this appeal relate, primarily, to the sufficiency of the information upon which the defend*272ant was brought to trial Tbe information reads as follows. :
“Henry Rickenberg, having been heretofore duly committed to this court by Henry C. Lund, a committing magistrate of said county, to answer to this charge, is accused by Frank S. Richards, district attorney for the Third judicial district of the state of Utah, Salt Lake county, by this information, of the crime of having possession of intoxicating liquor, committed as follows, to wit: That the said Henry Rickenberg, at…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. HilbergUtah Supreme Court · 1900
- State v. SheffieldUtah Supreme Court · 1915
- State v. PayUtah Supreme Court · 1915
- State v. ThompsonUtah Supreme Court · 1906
- Fry v. HubnerOregon Supreme Court · 1899
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. KuselWyoming Supreme Court · 1923
- Peterson v. JacobsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
- State v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 1930
- State v. CrawfordUtah Supreme Court · 1922
- Hutchman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1937
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.