Rockford Malleable Iron Works v. Tilden
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Van Buren; Des Voignes, J. Assumpsit by thé Rockford Malleable Iron Works, a foreign corporation, against B. E. Tilden for a balance claimed to be due for goods sold and delivered. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
Plaintiff sued to recover a balance *81claimed to be due for a quantity of malleable iron replacing frogs, which, it delivered to defendant, of $414.91, and interest.
Defendant pleaded the general issue, and gave notice that he entered into a supplemental agreement with Harry Forbes, president of the plaintiff company, to take the place of the first contract. The defendant also gave notice under the plea of the general issue of damages he claimed to have sustained because of the alleged breach of the contract by the plaintiff. The items which he sought to recoup aggregated $491.32. The jury found…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Downer v. ChesebroughSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1869
- Home Life Insurance v. ElwellMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Newton v. Consolidated Construction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915
- Ritchie v. SteniusMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Georgia v. BondMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Michigan Lubricator Co. v. Ontario Cartridge Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1921
- Turbyfill v. International Harvester Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1980