Legal Opinion
Charles Tesseyman v. John W. Fisher, Lurene W. Fisher and United States of America
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 8, 1955No. 14413_1PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Per curiam
The appeal in this case is taken from the order of the trial court denying a motion of appellant Tesseyman to intervene in a suit pending there.
The action in which intervention was sought was commenced June 4, 1953, in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of San Luis Obispo. John W. Fisher and Lurene W. Fisher set up that they were the owners in fee simple of the property in litigation and that the United States claimed an interest therein adverse to the Fishers which constituted a cloud upon their title. They further pleaded that they had acquired title at judicial…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cameron v. President and Fellows of Harvard CollegeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1946
- Tesseyman v. FisherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Fisher v. Nash Building Co.California Court of Appeal · 1952
3Cited by12 opinions
- Smith Petroleum Service, Inc. v. Monsanto Chemical Company, Monsanto Chemical Company v. Smith Petroleum Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- 16 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1089, 16 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 8164 Maria Alaniz v. Tillie Lewis Foods, Robert Beaver, Applicant-IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Johnson v. San Francisco Unified School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. RhodesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
- Alleghany Corp. v. KirbyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.