Legal Opinion

Matter of Kulink

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 2018No. 20180083PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tufte, Justice.

[¶ 1] Aaron Kulink appeals from an order denying discharge from commitment as a sexually dangerous individual. Kulink argues (1) the district court did not make sufficient findings on the "likely to reoffend" and "serious difficulty controlling behavior" elements and (2) the State did not meet its burden of clear and convincing evidence on the two required elements. We retain jurisdiction under N.D.R.App.P. 35(a)(3) and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

I

[¶ 2] The district court conducted a hearing on Kulink's civil commitment on February 9, 2018. At…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kansas v. CraneSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Rothberg v. RothbergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Feland v. J.M.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  4. In the Matter of MidgettNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Interest of JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. William Joseph Carter State v. Carter (In Re Carter)North Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Interest of T.A.G.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Clarke v. TaylorNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Interest of CarterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Legacie-Lowe v. LoweNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API