Anderson v. Pringle
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Polk county to recover $124.99" for labor and materials, and to foreclose a mechanic’s lien therefor. The case was tried before Watts, J., who found that plaintiff was entitled to recover against defendants Grover and Jacobi in the sum of $60. From a judgment entered pursuant to the findings, those defendants appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
START, O. J.
This action was brought to establish and foreclose a mechanic’s lien on the premises described in the complaint. The plaintiff’s lien claim was abandoned by him on the trial, and the action then proceeded as one for the recovery of money only for materials furnished and services rendered by the plaintiff to the defendants E. J. Grover and G. R. Jacobi pursuant to an express contract between them. The trial court made its findings of fact and conclusions of law, and ordered judgment against the defendants named for $60 and interest. They appealed from the judgment so entered.
One of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Leeds v. LittleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Elliott v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- O'Dea v. City of WinonaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
3Cited by7 opinions
- Cornish, Curtis & Greene Co. v. Antrim Co-operative Dairy Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
- McClure v. Village of Browns ValleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- Mathis v. Holland Furnace Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1946
- Town of Birch Cooley v. First National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- Hoglund v. SortedahlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.