Legal Opinion

Livingston v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 15, 1894PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from the City Court of Montgomery. Tried before the. Hon. Thomas M. Arrington. The appellant was indicted, tried and convicted for burglary. There is but one question presented on the present appeal, which refers to the ruling of the court upon the introduction of evidence.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the City Court of Montgomery. Tried before the. Hon. Thomas M. Arrington. The appellant was indicted, tried and convicted for burglary. There is but one question presented on the present appeal, which refers to the ruling of the court upon the introduction of evidence. The facts in reference to this ruling are sufficiently stated in the opinion. cited Hodge v. State, 97 Ala. 37 ; Riley v. State, 88 Ala. 193 ; Young v. State, 68 Ala. 569. cited Riley v. State, 88 Ala. 193 ; Young v. State, 68 Ala. 569 ; Busby v. State, 77 Ala. 66 ; Hodge v. State, 97 Ala. 37.

1Opinion of the CourtHaralson, J.

A witness for the State testified that there were some tracks found near the building which had been burglarized ; that pne of the tracks was made *128by a person wearing a number 6 or 7 shoe ; that defendant wore a 6 or 7 shoe, and “these (trades) corresponded, in his opinion, with the track of defendant.” To the part of this evidence which is italicized, the defendant objected, but the court admitted it, and defendant excepted. There was other evidence, tending to show that the defendant was guilty, and some tending to show he was not. The court admitted, that, of itself, this evidence was not…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Young v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  2. Hodge v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
  3. Riley v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
  4. Busby v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Pope v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  2. Brindley v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  3. Moss v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  4. Daniell v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1954
  5. Loper v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API