Legal Opinion

Peetsch v. Sommers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1898PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiff, Henry Peetsch, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the defendants, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Hew York on the 22d day of January, 1898, upon the verdict of a jury, and also from an order entered in said clerk’s office on the 27th day of January, 1898, denying the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial made upon the minutes.

1Opinion of the Court

Ingraham, J.:

This was an action in replevin to recover certain merchandise which had been seized by the sheriff of the city and county of Hew York, under a warrant of attachment issued against one Edward Hughes. The plaintiff to prove title to the property introduced in evidence an instrument as follows :

“March 31s¿, 1894.
“ I hereby acknowledge that I am indebted to Mr. Henry Peetsch in the sum of Hine hundred & Fifty Hollars, in payment of this claim, I hereby sell & transfer all my stock of Liquors now in the' store S. W. Cor. of 14th St. & Ave. B consisting of 16 barrels of various liquors…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Anderson v. . BloodNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  2. Parker v. . ConnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  3. Lynch v. . CraryNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  4. Jacobs v. . MorrisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1892

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Castriotis v. . Guaranty Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
  2. Barton v. Albert Palmer Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  3. Dunn v. AckeeAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1899
  4. Hunter v. SeeryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
  5. Barton v. Albert Palmer Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API