Legal Opinion

Dunn v. Ackee

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided March 15, 1899PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, rendered in the Municipal Court of the city of New York, borough of Manhattan, for the first district.

1Opinion of the CourtLeventritt, J.

On January 17, 1894, Walter M. Eosebault, one of the plaintiffs, commenced an action against the Saratoga Kissengen Spring Company, and therein procured a warrant of attachment against its property.

After service thereof upon the defendant corporation, it, on February 3, 1894, furnished to the sheriff a certificate acknowledging indebtedness to the defendant in the attachment proceeding in the'sum of $95.74, which sum the defendant herein did not pay over to the sheriff but still retains. The action against the Saratoga Kissingen Spring Company proceeded to judgment on the 9th day of February,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lynch v. . CraryNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Peetsch v. SommersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Barton v. Albert Palmer Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  2. Barton v. Albert Palmer Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  3. V. G. Pfluke Co. v. PapuliasNew York Supreme Court · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API