Vicinanzo v. Best
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Yesawich Jr., J.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (initiated in this Court pursuant to CPLR 506 [b] [1]) to compel respondent Justice of the Supreme Court to sign a proposed qualified domestic relations order.
*740When the parties to this divorce action were last before this Court, we granted petitioner’s request for, inter alia, “an income deduction order * * * in a form which [would] qualify as a Qualified Domestic Relations Order [hereinafter QDRO] under ERISA (29 U.S.C. § 1056 [d])”, to take effect when respondent Vincent Vicinanzo (hereinafter respondent), her former spouse, began to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Legal Aid Society of Sullivan County, Inc. v. ScheinmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Klostermann v. CuomoNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Vicinanzo v. VicinanzoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- General Steel Products Corp. v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1959
- Bouchard v. AbbottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Vidurek v. Supreme CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Vidurek v. Supreme CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013