Legal Opinion
Vidurek v. Supreme Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 11, 2013Published
1Opinion of the CourtSpain, J.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR 78 (initiated in this Court pursuant to CPLR 506 [b] [1]) to compel respondent Justice of the Supreme Court to comply with an order issued by petitioners.
Respondent Justice of the Supreme Court (hereinafter respondent) dismissed petitioners’ third pro se action against, among others, the State Board of Elections, which advanced the same claims that we recently found to be not viable in Aprea v New York State Bd. of Elections (103 AD3d 1059 [2013]). Thereafter, petitioners filed a fictitious “court order,” issued by their self-proclaimed “court of record,” which,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sharrow v. Dick Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1994
- West 15th Street Associates v. MartinezNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
- Dyno v. RoseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Jemzura v. MugglinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Abbott v. ConwayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.