Legal Opinion

Harris County v. Crooker

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 2, 1920No. 2274PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In the view we take of the case it is not necessary to determine whether Act March 13, 1911, referred to in the statement above, was a local or special law, within the meaning of section 56 of article 3 of the Constitution, so far as it undertook to fix the compensation of the officer therein designated as "The criminal district attorney of Harris county"; for if it was such a law in that respect, it was not for that reason alone invalid. To have been within the inhibition in said section of the Constitution, the act in the respect stated must not only have been a local or special one, but it…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bexar County v. LindenTexas Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Altgelt v. GutzeitTexas Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Smith v. Grayson CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1897
  4. Bell County v. HallTexas Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Hall v. Bell CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. County of Harris v. CrookerTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Jones v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
  3. Kelly v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  4. Tom Green County v. ProffittCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
  5. Lamon v. FergusonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API