Feder v. Van Winkle
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On appeal and cross-appeal from a decree of the chancellor, •dated February 11th, 1895, in Brown v. Riverside Bridge and Iron Works, an insolvent corporation, on the application of the receiver of said corporation.
1Opinion of the CourtVan Syckel, J.
The controversy in this case is between the appellant, who has :a real estate mortgage, and John A. Van "Winkle, receiver of the Riverside Bridge and Iron Works, an insolvent corporation, and relates to certain machinery which was used in its business of manufacturing structural and bridge iron. The said company "had been engaged for fourteen or fifteen years in carrying on its business prior to its insolvency.
It occupied a tract of about two acres of land, on which the buildings in which the business was carried on were erected.
The buildings were—
1. The main shop, sixty by one hundred and…
2Cited by10 opinions
- General Motors Corp. v. City of LindenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
- McCalla v. Harnischfeger Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
- National Lead Co. v. Bor. of SayrevilleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
- Bk. of America v. La Reine Hotel Corp.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1931
- Fahmie v. NymanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.