Bates v. Western Electric
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
BRODERICK, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is the defendant’s motion to dismiss certain of the claims made in the plaintiffs’ complaint. In its motion the defendant contends that (1) the claim of plaintiffs under Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. must be dismissed because none of the named plaintiffs have sufficiently alleged in their complaint their compliance with the procedural jurisdictional prerequisites for filing a civil complaint under the Act; (2) the plaintiffs have failed to allege a conspiracy under 42 U.S.C. § 1985(3) and hence have failed to…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Franks v. RossCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
- Frank's v. RossCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
- T Mobile Northeast LLC v. City of WilmingtonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Electronics Warehouse, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1988
- Ratcliffe v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.