Legal Opinion

State v. Fairfield

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 1, 1926No. 19953. Department OnePublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

— Appealing from a judgment of conviction and sentence on a jointist charge, appellant, for reversal, first urges that the information is insufficient. The information charges, appellant and three others with haying, in Snohomish county, Washington, during the period beginning the 20th day of October, 1924, and the 31st day of January, 1925, wilfully, unlawfully and feloniously opened up, conducted and maintained, in the town of Mukilteo in that county and state, a certain place known as the Fairfield Hotel,. Pool and Billiard Hall and Confectionery Store, with the appurtenances thereunto…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. BrooksSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  2. State v. PerrinWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  3. State v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  4. State v. KallasWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  5. State v. MaloneyWashington Supreme Court · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. NavoneWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  2. State v. LindseyWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  3. State v. FairfieldWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  4. State v. NormanWashington Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API