Legal Opinion

State v. Anderson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 1925No. 18936. Department TwoPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

The appellant, Charlie Anderson, was charged with, and convicted of, the crime of opening np, conducting and maintaining a place for the unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor.

The facts concerning the offense, which the jury were warranted in finding, were in substance these: One Tom Ohm had a license from the city of Spokane, authorizing him to sell soft drinks at a designated place therein. At the place designated he maintained a bar, over which he openly sold the commodities usually kept for sale in such places.. Close to the bar in the floor of the barroom was a trapdoor, leading to a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. PistonaWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  2. State v. PerrinWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  3. State v. BussiWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  4. State v. ProfferWashington Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. NicholsWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  2. State v. PielowWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  3. State v. DonatiWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  4. State v. DahlWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  5. State v. EspelandWashington Supreme Court · 1926

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API