Legal Opinion
Natale v. Upjohn Company
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided November 5, 1964No. Civ. A. 2841PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEEL, District Judge.
Defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint raises the question, among others, whether the Pennsylvania or Delaware statute of limitations is applicable to a cause of action which arose in Pennsylvania, when jurisdiction is based upon diversity of citizenship.
The claim of plaintiff, Mrs. Natale, is for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by her as a result of the use of two drugs which were prescribed by her physicians. The drugs, Monase and Catron, were manufactured by the two defendants. The claim of the other plaintiff, Mrs. Natale’s husband, is for…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Davis v. MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Midstate Horticultural Co. v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Wells v. Simonds Abrasive Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Osbourne v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- RMS Technology, Inc. v. TDY Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
- Anthony Natale and Julia Natale, His Wife v. The Upjohn Company and Lakeside Laboratories, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
- Pitts v. Northern Telecom, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
- CHC Investments, LLC v. FirstSun Capital BancorpCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2020
- Commercial Credit Corp. v. Pasquarello, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lawrence County1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.