Legal Opinion

Territory of Hawaii v. Hu Seong

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 1911PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Arpear jbom District Magistrate oe Honolulu.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

DE BOUT, J. (Robertson, C.J., dissenting.)

This is an appeal on points of law from a judgment- of the district magistrate of Honolulu, finding the defendant guilty of the offense of furnishing opium or a preparation thereof to another, contrary to the provisions of section 1399, R. L., which reads: “The board of health may, upon the conditions to be named in such authorization, authorize any duly qualified physician or surgeon, or any person holding a license to sell poisonous drugs, to sell for medical purposes only, opium and preparations thereof; provided, however,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Burns v. SewellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  2. Commonwealth v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1876
  3. Watson Coal & Mining Co. v. JamesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887
  4. Republic of Hawaii v. AkauHawaii Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Silvestri v. MissocchiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re Tax Appeal of Travelocity.Com., L.P. v. Director of Taxation.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API