Legal Opinion
Bell v. Southern Pacific Co.
California Supreme Court
Decided August 14, 1922No. S. F. No. 10082PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MYERS, J., pro tem.
Upon further consideration we are satisfied with, and hereby adopt, as part hereof, the following opinion herein of the district court of appeal for the first district, written by Mr. Justice Waste:
“This is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the lower court awarding plaintiff $1000 damages, and costs, for the killing of certain horses. The cause of action was based upon the alleged failure of the defendant to maintain good and sufficient fences along its right of way, by reason of which the animals were allowed to go on the track of the railroad where they were…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Missouri Pacific Railroad v. AultSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. North Dakota Ex Rel. LangerSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- French v. SenateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- People v. MayesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Nash v. Southern Pac. Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1919
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Young v. Boy Scouts of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Marr v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Nev-Cal Electric Securities Co. v. Imperial Irr. Dist.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
- Cherry v. HaydenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Pietro v. PietroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.