Legal Opinion

United States v. Clay

District Court, M.D. Alabama

Decided September 7, 2001No. CR. 99-137-NPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge.

Defendant Clarence Clay has challenged the jury selection procedure used to pick the trial jury that convicted him of drug crimes in violation of 21 U.S.C.A. § 846. As relief, he requests that the court grant him a new trial. Clay’s challenge was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Charles S. Coody, who has now recommended that a new trial be granted. After consideration of the magistrate judge’s well-reasoned recommendation and after an independent review of the record, the court concludes that the recommendation should be adopted and a new trial…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
  2. Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Duren v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Castaneda v. PartidaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Spector Motor Service, Inc. v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1944

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. King v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2003
  2. United States v. CarmichaelCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
  3. United States v. CarmichaelDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2006
  4. Burkette v. H.R. III, L.L.C.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2006
  5. David Earl King v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API