Duren v. City of Binghamton
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Lehman, Ch. J.
The city of Binghamton voluntarily assisted a W. P. A. project as a convenient means of reducing the burden of providing relief to the indigent. It furnished space for the work and invited workers in the W. P. ,A. project to use a corridor in a building where the city stored supplies for distribution to persons requiring relief. .'The city owed a duty to these workers to exercise reasonable care in maintaining the corridor in a safe condition. The evidence sustains a finding that employees of the department of the city in charge of its relief work created a dangerous condition…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Whittaker v. Village of FranklinvilleNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Oeters v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Engels v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Nathanson v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
3Cited by6 opinions
- Miller v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Commissioners of the State Insurance Fund v. Town of HowardNew York Supreme Court · 1941
- In re the Accounting of FallettaNew York Surrogate's Court · 1960
- In re DibbleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
- Jacobson v. New York Racing Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.