Legal Opinion

In re Dibble

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 5, 1941Published

1Opinion of the Court

• Bliss, J.

The underlying question here is whether the wages received by Walter W. Woodward on a Works Progress Administra*347tion work relief project constituted relief within the meaning of the Public Welfare Law. It is conceded that the Woodward family lived in the town of West Bloomfield, Ontario county, N. Y., from June 22,1936, to July 1, 1938, and that during this period Mr. Woodward was employed on a Works Progress Administration project. If the wages which he received did not constitute relief within the meaning of the Public Welfare Law as it then stood, then Woodward and his family had…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Duren v. City of BinghamtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  2. Duren v. City of BinghamtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API