Legal Opinion

Second National Bank v. Smith

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 3, 1918PublishedCited by 6 opinions

On appeal from the Supreme Court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the eonrt was delivered by

Walker, Chancellor.

This case is here on appeal from a judgment entered on the verdict of a jury in the Supreme Court, Hudson circuit, involving the validity of the notice of protest of a promissory note. The note was made by Harry 6. Runkle, and endorsed by the late- William Runkle in his lifetime. It was discounted by the plaintiff bank and the proceeds were paid to Harry G-. Runkle, the maker. William Runkle, the endorser, died January 31, 1914, before the maturity of the note, leaving a will in which he appointed William E. R. Smith executor. Harry…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Goodnow v. WarrenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Connelly v. Greenfield Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
  2. Trustees System Co. v. LisenaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1930
  3. In Re FrankelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  4. In Re the Estate of Santa PerroneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
  5. First National Bank of Belmar v. CarpenterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API