Kann v. Wausau Abrasives Co.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtMarble, J.
A demurrer in equitable proceedings does not differ essentially from a demurrer in an action at law. It "admits the truth of the facts stated in the bill, so far as they are relevant and are well pleaded” (Craft v. Thompson, 51 N. H. 536, 540), but insists that, upon the facts so stated, the plaintiff is not entitled to equitable relief.
The material allegations of the bill in the present case are as follows:
The defendant is a Wisconsin corporation engaged in the manufacture of abrasive papers, cloths, and grinding discs, and in connection with its business it owns and operates a garnet mine…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Marble Co. v. RipleySupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- State v. PhillipsTennessee Supreme Court · 1850
- Work v. WelshIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
- American Smelting & Refining Co. v. Bunker Hill & Sullivan Mining & Concentrating Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 1918
- Solter v. Leedom & Worrell Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1918
3Cited by9 opinions
- Campbell Soup Co. v. LojeskiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- Thompson v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1955
- Manchester Dairy System, Inc. v. HaywardSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1926
- Pittenger Equipment Co. v. Timber Structures, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1950
- Rowan v. Harburney Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1937
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.