Legal Opinion
United States v. Bollman
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided February 24, 1936No. 10394PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Circuit Judge.
This is the second time this case has been before this court. For the opinion on the first appeal, see United States v. Bollman, 73 F.(2d) 133.
After the decision on the first appeal, the case was tried again, resulting in a verdict and- judgment for the appellee. On the second trial, the decision of this court on the first appeal was accepted as the law of the case, and the issues were tried and determined accordingly.
On this appeal the only question presented for our consideration is, “Was plaintiff’s (appellee’s) suit, filed December 12, 1932, to contest a forfeiture…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Messenger v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Thompson v. Maxwell Land Grant & Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Virtue v. Creamery Package Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Ayers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
- Trapp v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp. v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
- Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Company v. Rayford J. WrightCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
- Kaku Nagano v. Brownell, Atty. GenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954
- Kleinschmit v. Farmers Mut. Hail Ins. Ass'n of IowaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
- New York Life Ins. v. GolightlyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938