Legal Opinion
People v. Webb
New York County Courts
Decided March 26, 1993PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Eugene L. Nicandri, J.
The first branch of defendant’s motion, to compel an answer to the demand to produce, is moot in view of the fact that the People have already tendered the requested item.
With respect to the request for an amplified bill of particulars, the request is denied. The People have sufficiently identified the period of time in which the charges in the indictment are alleged to have taken place.
The defendant’s rights to a Sandoval hearing (People v Sandoval, 34 NY2d 371) are reserved to a pretrial hearing.
Defendant also asks the court to suppress his…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- People v. SandovalNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- People v. HughesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. GroffNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. BatashureNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- People v. KnowellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. WardenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995