Legal Opinion
Hiner v. Penn-Harris-Madison School Corp.
District Court, N.D. Indiana
Decided March 28, 2003No. 3:01-CV-0733 CANPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
NUECHTERLEIN, United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiffs, twenty bus operators employed by Defendant Penn-Harris-Madison School Corporation, filed a claim for unpaid overtime compensation pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act (“the FLSA”) and the Indiana Wage Statute on October 15, 2001. Plaintiffs moved for Partial Summary Judgment on October 15, 2002, alleging that mandatory bus inspections and all drive time should be included as hours worked under the FLSA. On October 17, 2002, Defendant moved for Partial Summary Judgment, alleging that certain compensated time was…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Morrison v. Executive Aircraft Refinishing, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2005
- Gonzalez v. Farmington Foods, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2003
- Miller v. Blumenthal Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
- Koch v. Jerry W Bailey Trucking IncDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2020