Legal Opinion
Joy v. Farmers Nat. Bank of Chickasha
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 26, 1932No. 20773PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCullison, J.
Defendant ini error herein, plaintiff below, instituted suit in the district court of Grady county, Okla. (cause No. 10808), seeking to recover for the conversion of 25 bales of cotton represented by 25 warehouse receipts delivered to plaintiff as security for a loan of $1,875.
Plaintiff filed a second suit in the district court of Grady county, Okla. (cause No. 10809), seeking to recover a similar amount and under the same circumstances as enumerated in cause No. 10808.
The elements involved in both eases being-identical, said eases were consolidated for trial, which trial resulted in judgment…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Barbaroux v. BarkerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1862
- Gleason v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Citizens' State Bank of Vici v. GettigSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Traders Compress Co. v. PrecureSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Eccles & Co. v. MunnSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Well Bros., Inc. v. KeenanMississippi Supreme Court · 1938
- City Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v. FinchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
- American Cotton Co-Op. Ass'n v. Union Compress & Warehouse Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1942
- Gooch v. Natural Gas Supply Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- City Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v. FinchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.