Legal Opinion

State Auto Property & Casualty Insurance v. Swaim

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 10, 1999No. 99-17PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert L. Brown, Justice.

This appeal involves a claim to pay insurance benefits under a homeowner’s policy issued by appellant State Auto Property and Casualty Insurance Company (State Auto). The complaint was filed by the appellees Larry and Drenda Swaim, who are the insureds, and relief was sought for breach of contract and the tort of bad faith. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the Swaims on both counts. State Auto now raises several points for reversal. We affirm the judgment for damages relating to breach of contract but reverse the judgment for bad faith. We affirm the award of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Union Pacific Railroad v. SharpSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  2. Arthur v. ZearleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  3. Wheeler Motor Co., Inc. v. RothSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  4. Viking Ins. Co. of Wisconsin v. JesterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  5. Reynolds v. Shelter Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. FooteSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  2. Batas v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  3. Ethyl Corp. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  4. McMickle v. GriffinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  5. Bank of Eureka Springs v. EvansSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API