United States v. Hartley
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GARRECHT, Circuit Judge.
On June 20, 1936, Malcolm Hartley, appellee here, filed an action upon a contract of war risk insurance issued him in 1918 while he was a member of the armed forces of the United States engaged in the war against Germany and her allies. He alleged that he became totally and permanently disabled within the period when the policy of insurance was in full force and effect, and prayed judgment in the contract sum of $57.50 for each and every month elapsing *924from and after July 14, 1919, the date of his discharge, and other relief. Issue was joined and trial had, which…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Lumbra v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- United States v. SpauldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Miller v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- White v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- United States v. HillCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States of America, for the Use and Benefit of Weyerhaeuser Company v. Bucon Construction Company, Inc., and Travelers Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Washington v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
- Butte Copper & Zinc Co. v. AmermanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946
- Ronald Porterfield v. Burlington Northern Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- State of Washington v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.