Legal Opinion

Blegen v. Monarch Life Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 9, 1985No. C8-84-1504PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FOLEY, Judge.

This is an action to obtain damages from Monarch Life Insurance Company and its agent, William Helms, for alleged misrepresentations concerning the rate of return of an annuity. At the close of the plaintiff’s case, the trial court directed a verdict in favor of Monarch and Helms on several grounds. We affirm.

FACTS

In the 1960’s, Harold Conrad was the owner of four small companies. Conrad sought to establish a pension plan for his office employees.

William Helms was an agent for the Monarch Life Insurance Company. Helms had sold Conrad’s companies a health insurance program…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Stark v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  2. Duxbury v. BoiceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
  3. Morrill v. Little Falls Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  4. First National Bank v. StraitSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  5. Bustad v. BustadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. TCF National Bank v. Market Intelligence, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
  2. Janice S. Hope v. Mirek KlabalCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
  3. Marvin Klehr and Mary Klehr William G. Olson, Intervenor v. A.O. Smith Corporation A.O. Smith Harvestore Products, Inc., Jointly and SeverallyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
  4. Michael John Hernandez v. General Mills Federal CreditCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
  5. Geraldine Goellner v. Julius Butler, M.D., University of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API